Adriana Cordis, an associate professor of accounting at Winthrop, and Chris Kirby
of UNC Charlotte submitted their paper, entitled "Capital expenditures and firm performance:
evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of stock returns," for publication in Accounting
& Finance.
Their article won the Peter Brownell Manuscript Award for the best paper published
in the journal in 2017. The award was announced at the AFAANZ conference in July.
ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA — A Winthrop University accounting faculty member co-wrote
an article that won an award this summer from a prestigious academic journal.
Adriana Cordis, an associate professor of accounting at Winthrop, and Chris Kirby of the University of North Carolina Charlotte submitted their paper, entitled "Capital
expenditures and firm performance: evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of stock
returns," for publication in Accounting & Finance, an academic journal published in cooperation with the Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ). It appeared in the December 2017 issue.
Their article won the Peter Brownell Manuscript Award for the best paper published in the journal in 2017. The award was announced at the
AFAANZ conference in July.
Cordis said their paper looks at the relation between capital investment and stock market performance. They started with the question: do the capital investment decisions of managers
affect the value of a firm's stock?
"In theory, the managers of a firm should not invest in new projects unless doing
so increases shareholder value," Cordis said. But prior academic studies find an inverse
relation between capital investment and average stock returns across firms, which
has been interpreted as evidence that many managers overinvest in capital projects
and destroy shareholder value.
Cordis and Kirby questioned this conventional wisdom. "If investors demand a high expected rate of
return for holding a firm's stock, then the managers of the firm should use a high
cost of capital (discount rate) to compute the net present value of new projects,"
the two wrote. "Hence, firms that have high expected stock returns should exhibit
both lower levels of capital investment and higher stock returns than firms that have
low expected stock returns, all else being equal."
Their paper formalized this argument using a simple two-period model of optimal investment,
and showed that the model's predictions find substantial support in the data. Their
results therefore pose a challenge to those who argue that overinvestment is a widespread
feature of capital-budgeting practices.
Accounting & Finance is widely read by academics, graduate students and all those interested in research
in accounting and finance, as well as practitioners in accounting, corporate finance,
investments, and merchant and investment banking.
For more information, contact Cordis at cordisa@winthrop.edu.